Algiers – Researcher and writer Ahmed Bensaada described some contemporary writers as “neo-colonial writers” who act as “native informants,” pandering to former colonial powers at the expense of their cultural identity.
Speaking on “Canal Algérie,” Bensaada explained that neo-colonial writers tend to align with the former colonizer, adopt its most regressive ideologies, and exploit stereotypes to demonize their societies. He referenced his book “Kamel Daoud: Colonized Minds, A Counter-Investigation” (2016), noting that such writers are often promoted by literary systems that perpetuate colonialism, even decades after independence.
Bensaada elaborated that “neo-colonial writers are easily identifiable as they integrate seamlessly into the literature of the former colonizer, adopt its regressive ideas, and weaponize stereotypes to vilify their own societies.” He added that this alignment comes with rewards, such as recognition by prestigious media outlets, comparisons to great authors, and literary awards.
The writer also discussed the concept of a “native informant,” describing individuals who, due to their cultural background, are perceived as experts on issues related to their culture, despite lacking genuine qualifications.
Bensaada criticized the promotion of such figures in Western media, arguing that this perpetuates distorted views of cultural and religious realities. He also denounced some authors’ efforts to ingratiate themselves with “Zionist circles,” accusing writers like Kamel Daoud and Boualem Sansal of pandering to these groups for career advancement at the cost of their identity, language, and religion.
Highlighting specific examples, Bensaada pointed to Kamel Daoud’s claim of being “more French than the French” after obtaining French citizenship. He also cited Boualem Sansal’s lack of solidarity with the Palestinian people, a stance Bensaada criticized as “encouraging barbarism.”
For more cultural insights, visit DZWATCH.DZ.
Author: Nor-Eleslam
