A new report alleges that the Biden administration received intelligence briefings in late 2024 raising serious concerns about potential violations of international law by Israeli officials during the war in Gaza. Despite these warnings, the administration continued its support for Israel, according to three former U.S. officials who spoke to the *HuffPost*. This revelation, if accurate, could have significant legal and political ramifications for both the United States and Israel.
The report claims that the intelligence assessments detailed how Israeli officials themselves viewed the legality of their actions in Gaza, particularly concerning the scale of military operations and the severe restrictions placed on humanitarian aid. According to one former official, these internal Israeli perspectives, coupled with the actions on the ground, were deemed so sensitive that they triggered an emergency interagency meeting attended by President Biden himself.
The discussions reportedly centered on potential options for mitigating legal exposure, including halting intelligence sharing with Israel to limit the U.S.’s potential complicity in alleged war crimes. Some officials reportedly believed the intelligence constituted the strongest evidence of Israeli violations of international law since the conflict began in October 2023. The *HuffPost* report further alleges that then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken privately questioned whether Israel’s actions constituted “ethnic cleansing,” a term the administration publicly avoided.
The report highlights a stark contrast between the internal deliberations and the public posture of both the Israeli government and the Biden administration. Both consistently rejected external assessments concluding that Israeli actions amounted to ethnic cleansing or war crimes, instead emphasizing the “brutality” of Hamas.
However, according to the *HuffPost* sources, these internal discussions failed to translate into concrete policy changes. A request from State Department officials involved in international law for a dedicated intelligence briefing on the potential for Israeli ethnic cleansing was reportedly denied.
The concerns within the White House were not solely humanitarian; legal worries were also paramount. Some officials reportedly feared personal liability for continuing military support to Israel while being aware of potential violations of international law. The report indicates a growing sense of unease within the administration as Biden’s term neared its end and the incoming Trump administration prepared to take office. The perceived reluctance to alter course on the Gaza conflict stemmed, in part, from this impending transition.
According to sources cited by *HuffPost*, the new intelligence fueled considerable alarm within the administration, with some U.S. officials viewing it as evidence of “specific intent” on the part of certain Israeli officials in their military operations. One former senior U.S. official stated that discussions about the potential legal liability of American officials began as early as the first month of the war.
Furthermore, State Department and USAID staff reportedly argued that continued support for Israel in light of this information meant the United States was “knowingly violating the law.” While agency leaders reportedly did not dispute this assessment, implicitly acknowledging a “real legal risk” based on intelligence, they avoided taking any formal or decisive stance.
This report raises critical questions about the extent of the Biden administration’s knowledge regarding potential war crimes in Gaza and the implications for U.S. foreign policy. If the allegations are true, it suggests a significant disconnect between the administration’s private concerns and its public support for Israel.
**Potential Ramifications**
For more information about Palestine, check our dedicated section.
The implications of this report are far-reaching. Legally, it could open the door to lawsuits against U.S. officials for aiding and abetting war crimes. Internationally, it could further damage the United States’ reputation as a defender of human rights and international law. Politically, it could fuel further divisions within the Democratic Party, where support for Israel has become increasingly contested.
For Israel, the report could lead to increased scrutiny from international courts and organizations. It could also complicate Israel’s relationship with other countries, particularly those that are strong proponents of international law. The International Criminal Court (ICC) is already investigating alleged war crimes committed by both Israeli forces and Hamas in the Palestinian territories. This report could provide further evidence for the ICC to consider.
**The Need for Investigation**
Given the gravity of these allegations, a thorough and independent investigation is warranted. This investigation should examine the intelligence briefings received by the Biden administration, the internal discussions that took place, and the decisions that were made regarding U.S. policy towards Israel. The findings of this investigation should be made public to ensure transparency and accountability.
It’s important to note that these are allegations based on anonymous sources. Further investigation and verification are required to confirm their accuracy. However, the report highlights the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability regarding U.S. involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
**Impact on U.S.-Algerian Relations**
For Algeria, a nation with a historically strong stance on Palestinian rights and a commitment to international law, these allegations are likely to be viewed with serious concern. Algeria has consistently advocated for a just and lasting solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on international law and UN resolutions. This report could further solidify Algeria’s position as a vocal critic of Israeli policies and a strong supporter of the Palestinian cause. The Algerian government is likely to closely monitor any investigations into these allegations and may use its diplomatic influence to push for greater accountability.
DZWatch will continue to follow this developing story and provide updates as they become available. The credibility of this report, the response from current and former U.S. officials, and the potential investigations that may follow will all be critical in determining the long-term impact of these allegations on U.S.-Israeli relations and the broader international landscape.
