Explore the dynamic between Web 2.0’s centralization and the decentralized prospects of Web 3.0 in social media, as we delve into the latest technology shifts and solutions on dzwatch.net. Web 3.0 vs. Web 2.0
The Digital Standoff: Web 3.0 and the Promise of Decentralization
In every conflict, narratives vie for the public’s attention, each side presenting its own story. However, when these stories clash with the interests of social media platforms, voices can be silenced, and narratives can be suppressed through account bans or restricted reach. This is particularly evident in issues like Islamophobia, the Palestinian cause, LGBTQ+ community matters, and the extreme right vs. left ideological wars.
One of the most significant upheavals in social media was Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter, which saw the unbanning of hundreds of previously muzzled accounts. This issue isn’t new, and it’s worth examining from a technical perspective to understand the current technological landscape and available solutions.
This is essentially a clash between Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 technologies. To grasp this battle, one must understand what Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 entail.
Web 2.0: The Present Internet Model
Web 2.0 represents the current state of the internet, relying on the client-server model. Simplistically, when you visit a website or open an app on your mobile device, your information is fetched from a single, central server owned by the service provider.
Additionally, this central server controls access to another key server, the Domain Name System (DNS) server, which acts as the internet’s backbone, directing traffic to website addresses. When you enter a website like “example.com” in your browser, this request is routed to the DNS server, which then points to the server hosting the desired website. These DNS servers are usually managed by a centralized group of companies, such as Google and Cloudflare.
This centralization means that the internet, by its very nature, can be controlled in nearly every aspect by these central services. With such centralization comes the risk of a single point of failure—if one central server goes down, many services reliant on it can come to a halt.
When using services like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, PayPal, and Uber, you must recognize that you do so under their terms, and they reserve the right to ban or cancel your account for non-compliance.
Web 3.0: The Decentralized Alternative
In contrast, Web 3.0 represents a shift towards decentralization, where no single entity has control, potentially offering an alternative to the centralized status quo.
For in-depth insights into the battle between Web 3.0’s decentralization and Web 2.0’s centralized systems and how it’s shaping our digital world, visit dzwatch.net.
