The Algerian national team’s exit from the quarter-finals of the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations has ignited a fierce debate about fairness and integrity within the Confederation of African Football (CAF). The controversy surrounding the match has brought renewed scrutiny to the management of the sport on the continent, particularly concerning crucial matches and vested interests.
CAF’s decision to launch an investigation into the incidents surrounding the Algeria-Nigeria match has been met with skepticism. The Algerian Football Federation (FAF) had promptly filed complaints with both CAF and FIFA, demanding a thorough probe into what they consider a blatant case of refereeing malpractice, implicating the Senegalese referee Issa Sy and the Video Assistant Referee (VAR), Ghislaine Otcho.
Despite the apparent disadvantage suffered by the Algerian team, there are growing concerns that the investigation could be manipulated to penalize Algeria rather than deliver justice. Reports circulating within African football circles suggest that the narrative is being twisted to accuse Algerian players of inciting chaos and attempting to assault the referee. This narrative, promoted by Moroccan media outlets, appears to be a prelude to potential sanctions, either financial or disciplinary. This scenario is becoming increasingly familiar whenever Algerian interests clash with CAF’s prevailing agenda.
The core issue extends beyond individual refereeing decisions. Critics argue that CAF has lost its independence and has become unduly influenced by Fouzi Lekjaa. He has allegedly transformed the continental body into an entity that promotes a singular agenda and marginalizes dissenting voices. In this context, CAF President Patrice Motsepe appears to be a figurehead with limited power to enforce integrity or curb abuses. This environment fosters recurring instances of biased officiating, ultimately undermining the integrity and enjoyment of African football.
DZWatch will continue to follow this developing story.
